HomeJoin, Donate & Save a LifeData & StatisticsEducation & SafetyLegislation & PolicyMaine HeadlinesMCAHV NewsAboutContacts & Links
Preventing Gun Violence in Maine
MCAHV News

May 2010
Without mandatory checks on private sales from ads and at gun shows, the problem will only get worse.
By SANDRA SCULLY
CUMBERLAND — In light of the recent “open carry rally” in Portland (where firearms were openly displayed), it might be of interest to review the gun situation in Maine.
Maine has one of the highest gun ownership rates in the country and a higher rate of death from firearms than Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, New Hampshire and six other states.
About 13 children and 100 adults die in Maine each year from firearms. The most recent data from the Maine Center for Disease Control show that the suicide rate for people ages 20 to 24 is 30 percent above the national average, and firearms account for more than 50 percent of these deaths.
It is legal for a 16-year-old (with parental permission) to buy a rifle and an 18-year-old, a handgun. Drinking is legal at 21 and a driver’s license at 16.
Maine is the No. 1 supplier of guns used in crimes in Massachusetts. The U.S. attorney in Portland, working with federal agencies in Maine and Massachusetts, has targeted two-way traffic (guns to Massachusetts and drugs to Maine) with extensive use of undercover agents, informants, specialized Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and FBI agents from outside the region and cooperative programs with local and state law enforcement.
They investigate and prosecute both the out-of-state dealers and their Maine resident accomplices, including students and young women enlisted as “straw buyers” (who buy guns legally and resell them to those who would not pass a background check), as well as local gun dealers who illegally sold to unqualified buyers, some of whom turned out to be law enforcement officers working undercover.
The investigation and prosecution of the gun and drug trafficking remain a high priority of all law enforcement agencies along the I-95 corridor. Maine requires no background checks or records of gun sales at gun shows (except from licensed dealers) or sales made through ads in Uncle Henry’s shopping guide and newspapers.
More than 885 Mainers failed background checks during the most recent three years for which data is available. To fail, one has to be a convicted felon or domestic abuser or to have been deemed mentally unfit.
Massachusetts has much stricter gun regulations, making it easier to buy guns in Maine. Many states (eight, in fact) require background checks at all gun shows. Only one gun show in Maine requires licensed dealers (in Bangor). Polls show that 88 percent of Mainers would like stricter gun laws.
The gun lobby (the National Rifle Association and the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine) work relentlessly to weaken Maine’s very weak gun laws. When a bill was proposed in February to ban guns in Acadia National Park, SAM argued that its members needed firearms to protect themselves from criminals – because hunting is banned and there are no bears in that park.
The group I work with – Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence – is very respectful of hunters and target shooters. These people, for the most part, are responsible citizens who do not abuse their right to have firearms.
SAM would have people believe we are against all guns. Not so. As the only group in Maine working to reduce gun violence, we have made progress enacting new legislation to further this cause.
Mayors Against Illegal Guns, founded by mayors Michael Bloomberg in New York and Thomas Menino in Boston, will invest funds in Maine to improve our gun laws in order to reduce the flow of illegal guns to their urban areas.
In the past, MCAHV has distributed thousands of free gun locks throughout communities in Maine and will continue to submit new legislation in hopes of protecting domestic violence victims and others threatened by firearms.
— Special to the Press Herald

Special to MCAHV

 
THE TALE OF THE TRAVELING GUN
 
In the way of an introduction, my name is Steven Edmondson and I currently serve as the Domestic Violence Investigator for the Sagadahoc County District Attorney’s Office in Bath, Maine. I have been a Law Enforcement Officer in Maine for over three decades and as you might expect, I gave witnessed my share of needless tragedies involving the use of firearms.
For the better part of the past 20 years, I have frequented the pages of a Midcoast newspaper either on the editorial page with an OP-ED piece on Domestic Violence, various columns on selected public safety issues or a ranting Letter to the Editor whenever my ire is stirred. This piece however, is taking on a subject that should alarm us all on the sheer negligence and potential for tragedy. This story involves the travels of a particular gun; one not unlike many of you own or possess in your homes. I want to state at the beginning there is no underlying theme supporting gun control or interfering with anyone’s Second Amendment Rights. What I am about to describe however, should make the hair on everyone’s neck stand up just a little and take stock in what should be common sense gun safety.
PROLOGUE
The tale I am about to share involves the travels of a high-end .40 caliber, semi-automatic handgun similar to the one I carry on my hip every day. What makes this particular gun unique is how many hands this gun touched and how many crimes were committed and how many lives have been impacted in the process of its travels.
CHAPTER 1
We start in the late summer of 2009 with the arrest of a young man for pointing a gun at a motorist in Kennebec County that has all indications of a road-rage incident. What made a bad situation worse for our angry motorist was the person he allegedly pointed the gun at was an off-duty police officer.
Police locate and arrest the perpetrator here in Sagadahoc County for the offense and seize the gun used in the crime along with a second gun he had in his possession. A check with police records show arrests for this individual dating back three years for drug trafficking and possession. Unfortunately none of these offenses rose to a level that prohibited owning or possessing weapons.
Later in the day of this man’s arrest, his wife remembers there was a third gun in the car at the time of his arrest and locates it in a backpack in the trunk. Recognizing his bail conditions prohibit the possession of weapons and not wanting to have the gun around her, the wife takes the gun to an uncle of her husband here in Sagadahoc County for safe keeping.
We have reached the end of Chapter 1 with this gun, but far from the end of the story.
CHAPTER 2
Within days of the young man’s release on bail from the County jail on the original weapon and terrorizing offense, he was again arrested, this time for domestic assault on his wife in a central Maine county not far from here. With this offense, bail conditions required him to relocate away from his wife. Things seemed fine for several weeks until the young man had the electricity discontinued at the apartment he previously shared with his wife, along with extracting funds from their joint bank account. This did not sit well with the wife and when she discovered where her husband was staying, she called police in our County in late October to report her husband was currently residing with the uncle she had previously given the gun to for safekeeping.
Upon her call, local police followed up on her complaint and investigated the circumstances of her husband and the gun being under the same roof. The uncle readily handed over the gun to the officers who inspected it. It was determined her husband was not staying there at the time but the officers advised the uncle it would be in his best interest if the gun found a new home elsewhere so as to avoid problems. The uncle was very accommodating and agreed to relocate the gun promptly. To his credit, the uncle had the gun hidden and locked away even if his nephew had been present in the home. The uncle indicated he had actually long forgotten the firearm was even there as a couple of months had passed since he originally took it in.
When the wife was informed of the officers’ findings, she apparently was not satisfied. She proceeded to inform the officers that she recently discovered the uncle she previously gave the gun to for safekeeping, was a convicted felon and was by law prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm. I’m only speculating here but since her husband successfully avoided further interaction with law enforcement, she would throw the uncle under the bus.
Once our office was made aware of this new revelation, I was instructed to investigate her allegations. Sure enough, the uncle tasked by the young woman with keeping the gun out of her husband’s hands, had been convicted of crimes in another state 34 years ago when he was an admitted wayward youth. Nonetheless, those crimes were considered felonies and that stain stays on you for life. I met with the uncle for an interview and he readily acknowledged being a felon and admitted to handling the weapon before and after the officers came to his house. To his credit, he did take steps to remove the weapon from his residence as directed by the officers. The uncle was frank and honest in speaking to me but unfortunately we could not overlook the offense and he has suffered the consequences accordingly.
I would like to say this was the end of the story for this handgun but sadly that is not the case. This firearm has now been handled by two people after its owner had been arrested for a weapon offense with the uncle charged with the crime for merely being in possession of it.
CHAPTER 3
If the story ended here it would still be a shame for those involved but it only gets worse. Within days of being advised to relocate the handgun by the officers, the kindly uncle gave the gun to yet another relative in the same community before I ever become involved.
When the gun changed hands from the uncle to the next relative, step-father to the original owner, his teenage daughter, half-sister of the original owner, was present at the time of the exchange and became aware of the guns existence in her home. For reasons known only to her, she took the gun from her house and carried it around with her throughout town for a period of time. We are not sure how long she had or carried the gun around but it was determined her father received it on or about November 1 and the first report she had it in public was two weeks later.
The teenage apparently had shown the gun off to enough kids that word got to an adult who called the police on November 15. Local police responded to the report and located the young woman in a public place with some friends. The police told her what they were there for and searched her bag. Not finding the gun, the girl made up a story to the police on why she thought other kids would be saying such a thing. As it turned out, the gun was in a backpack of a young man sitting nearby to the teenage girl in question. Seeing officers drive by her earlier that day, the girl panicked and assumed they were looking for her. Fearing getting caught with the gun, she handed it off to the friend, a teenage boy, who now was carrying it around. It is worth noting the young man made no mention of the gun to the police when they questioned the girl sitting nearby. It is also worth mentioning that in the ensuing days when this case developed and the facts came out, it became known the young girl had posted pictures of herself with the gun on her MySpace page.
After the confrontation with police, the young man returned to his home in a neighboring town with the gun. Apparently guilt, fear or a conscious set in as he now had reservations about hanging on to this gun. After a few days of hiding the gun, he gave it to another young man he knew that had some experience with firearms. The second young man stashed the gun in a shed on his property for a couple of days before telling his father. For the first time in a long time involving this weapon, someone did the right thing at the right time. The father of the second boy took the gun to the local law enforcement agency to turn it in.
This of course is when the story started to unravel for the teenage girl. Both of the young men were truthful when questioned by police and eventually the trail lead back to the girl. She finally opened up and admitted her role with the gun and was also charged accordingly.
EPILOGUE
After all of this, the gun was finally in the authorities hands by the end of November. At some point in the near future it will be destroyed and what little metal it contains will contribute to the formation of a fire hydrant or manhole cover.
 Let’s review the history presented here. In a matter of six weeks, this firearm was handled by at least eight people, two of which were charged with offenses for merely possessing it, not to mention the original owner who was charged with a weapons offense and can no longer own it. I can think of two savings graces in this story. First and foremost, no one was injured. I have heard differing information on whether the gun was ever loaded during its travels.
The second positive note from this tale is hopefully a lesson for all who read this story. I have carried a firearm on my side for over three decades and I own several others. It has been drilled to me throughout my career on the safe handling and storage of firearms. Unfortunately, most gun owners have not had the opportunity to receive such education and training nor is it mandated with gun ownership. I would like to think common sense would be enough but sadly, that is just not the case. Aside from gun violence, too many people are injured or killed by sheer misconduct, mishandling and negligence. I read a story some time ago that indicated more people are shot with their own guns than by a stranger.
There are lessons to be learned from these events from all perspectives. Perhaps if the Police had searched the entire car after the initial arrest, they may have located the third handgun and these events would not have occurred. Or if the Police had taken the time to check the history of the uncle, they may have discovered his criminal history and at least ended this story before the teenage girl got her hands on the gun. To the Officers’ defense, the uncle had lived in the community for over twenty years with minimal contact with law enforcement with the officers having no indication of his criminal past or suspicion of his history.
We also cannot ignore the young girl’s father and his poor choice of storage for this weapon and of course the actions of the two young men who were accomplices of the teenage girl by hiding it for several days. 
Young people are determined and resourceful and holding on to assumptions everyone knows right from wrong when handling weapons is downright irresponsible. Any assumptions involving weapons should always lean towards the worst case scenario. That way if you act on those assumptions, you will be doing the right thing.   To say this gun is jinxed is diverting blame from human misconduct. I recall seeing a bumper sticker that read: “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people”. Again, I am not using this piece to project a stance on gun control but if nothing else comes from this column, it is my hope people take notice of the neglect and human error involved in the handling of this particular firearm and take steps to prevent it from happening in your homes.
The Second Amendment provides the right for citizens to own and possess firearms. It does not however, relieve you from your responsibilities of safe possession and proper ownership of firearms. Laws exist to address illegal, careless and reckless acts with firearms. Thousands of people are killed and injured each year in this country from firearms with a vast majority the result of needless accidents from careless handling and storage of firearms.
Whether you own a single pistol for protection, an avid hunter with a display case full of rifles and shotguns or a casual collector like myself, each firearm is a potential tragedy in waiting. The only thing preventing tragedy is the human element; you, me and every gun owner in America.
 

April 2010


Residents raise the issue of need vs. constitutional rights
4/10/10 | 185 comments
BDN Staff
BANGOR, Maine — The recent squabble over whether concealed firearms belong in Acadia National Park elicited passionate reactions from both sides of the issue, but for Tom Franklin, the debate had a side-effect.
“To insist on the right to carry weapons in Acadia National Park makes all gun owners look a little nuts,” said Franklin, who is president of the board of directors for Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence. “Acadia is the last place people should need a concealed weapon. I like to distance myself from that kind of talk about guns.”
     Franklin, a longtime hunter, said he has never had any interest in owning a handgun or obtaining a concealed firearm permit. For him and thousands of other Mainers, firearms are for a form of peaceful outdoor recreation that dates back centuries, not for use against another person.
“I’m concerned about the bad image that gun owners are getting because of extreme claims by other gun owners,” he said. “I see the rights of legitimate gun owners being really jeopardized.”
     But for others, what’s jeopardized during debates about banning concealed firearms in national parks or anywhere else is the constitutional right to bear arms. George Smith, executive director of the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine, said Maine’s concealed firearm law is an “unreasonable burden” and should be eliminated alto-gether. He said it does nothing to reduce violent crimes.
29,000 hidden guns
     According to Lt. David Bowler of the Maine State Police, 29,236 Mainers hold concealed firearm permits. A record of “good moral character,” an ability to handle a gun safely, completion of a four-page application and a $35 fee are among Maine’s requirements for the right to carry a hidden handgun. Applicants must also con-sent to the release of any records related to being a patient at one of the state’s two mental hospitals. For non-residents, the fee is $60 and all permits must be renewed every four years.
     “Maine has an excellent process in place,” wrote Bowler in response to e-mailed questions. “We have good people who care about what they do and take pride in their work to make our process a fair and safe one.”
     At least 11 states have more stringent requirements than Maine, according to the Web site www.USACarry.com
     Maine still is stricter than most of the remaining states, said Bowler.
    Some states also recognize permits from other states that have equal or more stringent requirements, he said. Maine recognizes permits from only three states — Delaware, South Dakota and Louisiana. Fifteen states recognize permits from Maine, according to USACarry.com.


Letter to the Editor
Portland Press Herald
April 8, 2010
 
Dear Editor:
            Every year hundreds of convicted felons, domestic abusers and mentally unfit individuals are allowed to buy handguns in Maine. During the last three years more than 880 persons failed the federal background check required to buy a gun from a dealer (such as L. L. Bean) in Maine.
            With very few exceptions the only way to fail the test is to come within one of the above three categories. Yet every one of those who failed the test was able to buy the gun of their choice from the hundreds advertised every week in Uncle Henry’s, or otherwise from a “private” seller, with no questions asked and often no written record of the sale.
            The Press-Herald recently reported the resistance of many private gun sellers to a new state program encouraging voluntary background checks for gun buyers. (The state program is based on the rather basic assumption that no responsible gun owner would want to sell their gun to a convicted felon, domestic abuser or mentally unfit buyer, nor would a responsible seller simply take the word of the buyer that they were just fine).
            One gun seller repeated the tired slogan of the NRA that the state should just enforce existing law rather than making new laws.
            But wait – that IS what a background check does, it simply enforces existing law that prohibits convicted felons, domestic abusers and mentally unfit persons from buying a gun!   
            And given the easy availability of any weapon through Uncle Henry’s with no background check requirement, the argument that background checks don’t work is sort of like arguing that a prison with all but one door locked proves that locks don’t work.                    
            Finally, a recent poll of Maine voters showed that by more than ten to one they favored requiring background checks for all handguns sold at gun shows.
            Maine voters want sensible gun laws and a system that requires background checks for some gun sales but not for all just doesn’t make sense, and doesn’t protect Maine residents from gun violence.
 
Ted Walworth, Lewiston


March 2010


Letters
– Lewiston Sun Journal
Tighten up Maine's laws
By Karen D'Andrea
Mar 22, 2010 12:00 am
Maine guns for Mass. drugs" (March 14) was an excellent piece of journalism. Congratulations to Mark LaFlamme for his coverage of this topic. Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence has been working on this issue for a considerable time and applauds his work.
The National Rifle Association has argued that there is no such thing as a gun show loophole and, on its Web site, calls it a myth. Tell that to the victims of crime in Massachusetts and New York where Maine guns, obtained legally here, were used by felons in the commission of those crimes.
In Maine, as the article pointed out, only federally licensed gun dealers such as L.L. Bean or Cabela’s require background checks. What it didn’t mention is that 200 to 300 people each year fail those checks. But those who fail, including felons, can easily obtain guns through Uncle Henry’s, immediately and without a background check. Uncle Henry’s lists hundreds of guns for sale or trade every week.
LaFlamme does a good job of pointing out that responsible gun owners do not want to sell a gun that might end up being used in a homicide, but realistically there are only two solutions: the gun seller can, voluntarily, go through a licensed dealer for the sale, or Maine needs to tighten up its laws and require all sellers to do background checks.
Karen A. D’Andrea, Director
Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence, Portland

February 2010

Letters 
Lewiston Sun Journal
Help save Acadia
By Edward Walworth, M.D.
Feb 27, 2010 12:00 am
The Feb. 20 Sun Journal had a story about a significant change in firearms regulations in our National Parks, including Acadia. A rider attached to the federal credit card legislation that has just gone into effect makes it possible for a person to carry a registered firearm openly (or concealed if the owner has such a permit) unless a state modifies the law. A bill currently being considered in Augusta would restore the previous regulations and make the standards consistent with existing policies in state parks.
Has there been any controversy in recent years about gun laws in Baxter or other state parks? What is the need for looser regulations in Acadia or Yellowstone? "Look Mom, there's Old Faithful. Look Dad, there's a Smith and Wesson."
Will there now be calls for rifles on Katahdin?
Ever since Barack Obama was elected, the strongest element of the nation's economy has been in sales of guns and ammunition, because it was felt that the president was going to "grab guns." As if to disprove that, Obama chose to sign the credit card bill despite the addition of the thoroughly unnecessary amendment.
I would urge Maine legislators to pass LD 1737, which would help leave Acadia the way it always has been — a popular destination for millions of visitors to Maine each year.
Edward Walworth, M.D., Lewiston

Letters to the Editor: Feb. 28, 2010
Portland Press Herald

Pull trigger on guns in Acadia?
It is amazing how the regulation of guns pops up in the darndest ways. Currently the National Rifle Association and the Sportsman's Alliance of Maine are fighting for the right to carry guns in Acadia National Park so their members can defend themselves against criminals!
Here is the background: In September, a last-minute amendment to the federal credit card reform act (yes, that's right, a credit card law!) repealed a policy established by Ronald Reagan that prohibited guns in national parks, but it allowed states to establish other policies and delayed the effective date of the law until February 2010.
A bill sponsored by House Speaker Hannah Pingree and others would restore the prior law (and treat Acadia and other national park lands in Maine the same as Maine state parks) by banning guns in national parks in Maine. The bill is supported by Friends of Acadia, the Appalachian Trail Conservancy and many other organizations.
The only organizations that opposed the bill at hearings in Augusta were the NRA and SAM. Both argued that their members need guns in the park in order to defend themselves against criminals. The NRA in a message to its members claimed the bill would turn ''our National Parks into victim zones by eliminating self-defense.''
One might ask why SAM, which supposedly represents hunters, now is so agitated about handguns and self-defense (maybe they are told what to do by the NRA?), but more broadly one might ask: Why are these guys so frightened? Do they really see a bogeyman behind every tree? Or is ''self-defense'' just a subterfuge for the masculine swagger that carrying a gun in public makes some men feel more important?
Whatever the rationale for their position, it is dangerous; it would change the experience of visiting a national park in Maine; it has nothing to do with hunting, which always has been banned in Acadia; and it really doesn't appeal to many members of the NRA or SAM who don't need or care about the swagger of carrying handguns in public.
With one member absent, the Criminal Justice Committee split 6-6 on the bill, which will now go to a floor vote. Support for the bill can be sent to www.maine.gov/legis/.
Tom Franklin
Portland


Letter to the Editor - PPH & BDN


Editorials
Closing gun show loophole would improve public safety
February 13, 2010
There was a considerable flap about a single question at the Associated General Contractors forum for gubernatorial candidates ("Gubernatorial hopefuls begin debate," Jan. 21), on "mandatory background checks on the purchase of firearms."
While not posed as a question, most of the candidates seemed to understand what it meant – to close the gun show loophole by requiring all sales of firearms, not just those from a licensed dealer, to require a background check on the purchaser.
The vast majority of candidates said no, but two of the 13 candidates stood with the majority of Mainers – Rosa Scarcelli and Eliot Cutler both agree with 88 percent of Mainers (Pan Atlantic poll, fall 2009) who would support background checks for gun purchases at gun shows.
Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence also agrees with the majority of Mainers. Closing the gun show loophole can help keep guns out of the hands of criminals (11 percent of guns used in the commission of crime in Massachusetts are from Maine) or domestic violence perpetrators (some research shows rates as high as 65 percent for intimate partners killed by handguns).
Recently Maine formed a working group to look at requiring the removal of guns from homes where a domestic violence arrest was made.
Every year in Maine, 200 to 300 people fail the background check because they were convicted of domestic abuse, a felony, or were found to be mentally ill. These people can easily use the gun show loophole to purchase guns through a variety of means, including picking up a copy of Uncle Henry's buying guide.
Even 65 percent of card-carrying members of the National Rifle Association support closing the gun show loophole (from a poll released in December by conservative pollster Frank Luntz).
En--courage your favorite candidate to take a stand in support of closing the gun show loophole.
Karen A. D'Andrea
Director, Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence
Portland



November 2009

MCAHV was asked by the Bangor Daily News to be part of a 5-part series on guns in Maine


11/14/09 |

11/14/09 |

11/19/09 |

11/18/09 |
Using ‘straw buyers,’ particularly women, part of crime trend

11/16/09 |


MCAHV Celebrated its 10th Anniversary
and 10th Anniversary Awards Dinner


 
Maine Humorist, Tim Sample joined MCAHV at our 10th anniversary Fitzgerald Awards Dinner. 

We honored Lewiston Mayor Larry Gilbert and former legislator and current Executive Director
of LearningWorks, Ethan Strimling.


(l to r) Board Member Ed Suslovic, MCAHV Founder
William Harwood, Esq, Board President J Thomas Franklin,
Award winners Ethan Strimling & Mayor Laurent Gilbert, &
MCAHV Director Karen D’Andrea


September 2009

MCAHV HIRES NEW DIRECTOR
Posted: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 11:50 am | Updated: 2:30 pm, Wed Sep 16, 2009.
Current
By Tess Nacelewicz |
Karen D'Andrea grew up in a hunting family where everyone - her father, her mother and all three kids - was adept at handling a gun.
Then, as a young woman, she joined the U.S. Marine Corps and learned to shoot an M-16 and lob a grenade.
Now, D'Andrea is the new director of Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence - and believes her background with guns will help her speak effectively for the group.
"I had experience with guns from an early age," the Scarborough resident said. "I'm not about taking guns out of anybody's hands. I support the Second Amendment. But there's a caveat: If you're a criminal, you shouldn't have a gun and you ought not to be able to get one easily."
Her experience with firearms is one of the many positive qualities that convinced Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence that D'Andrea was right for the job, according to Tom Franklin, the group's president.
The Portland-based nonprofit is dedicated to "preventing injuries and deaths caused by the excessive proliferation of firearms in our society," according to the group's Web site. The organization was formed after the 1999 shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado, Franklin said.
Franklin described D'Andrea as "a great new addition to our gun-control team."
He said that the organization selected D'Andrea - who runs her own consulting business for nonprofit organizations and who also is a Scarborough town councilor - for her skills in such areas as management, media relations and fundraising. Also, he said, "She has strong principles and integrity."
In addition, Franklin said, he hopes her hunting background will help the group attract more support from sportsmen. He believes hunters can get behind the organization's goal of regulating handguns and assault weapons so they don't fall into the wrong hands.
"Most hunters have no more interest in handguns than they do in Ping-Pong," Franklin said. "I think Karen can be very helpful to us in getting the message out to that community."
The Sportsman's Alliance of Maine could not be reached for comment by the Current's deadline.
D'Andrea said she looks forward to working with Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence on "some real, common-sense gun-control laws."
D'Andrea also said that her new part-time job is making her more aware of gun violence issues. As a town councilor, she said, she plans to talk to local police about what Scarborough does to promote gun safety.
Scarborough Police Chief Robert Moulton said that any increased awareness in town about violence prevention - whether the violence is caused by guns or by other means - is a good thing.
"It's positive that people recognize that it's out there," he said.
He said the Scarborough Police Department for the past six or seven years has participated in the Gun Lock Giveaway, a Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence program through which the group dispenses gun safety locks for free.
Moulton said Scarborough police have given out several hundred of the locks, which are particularly recommended in the households of gun owners where there are children. Police provide information on the giveaway program in a welcome brochure they distribute to residents and businesses new to town, Moulton said.
D'Andrea, the mother of a 19-year-old son, said: "I'm a real advocate for gun safety around children … If a child finds a gun, there's a real possibility they're going to play with it."
She said her father was very careful with his guns, keeping them locked in a cabinet, which she and her siblings could access only under supervision.
D'Andrea, 49, grew up in the town of Union Center in upstate New York.
With learning to hunt came lessons in responsible gun ownership, she said.
"We would sit around the table with dad and he'd teach us about cleaning and safety,"
she said.
While D'Andrea learned to use a gun, and her father, sister, brother and her mother all hunted, she herself shrank from actually killing any animals.
"I was the standout in the family," she said. "I never hunted … I loved Bambi - although I ate a lot of Bambi growing up. My dad was a big fisherman and a big hunter and we ate what he put on the table."
D'Andrea, who today is an avid birder, had dreams of becoming a veterinarian.
Instead, she dropped out of high school and was sleeping on friends' couches when she decided to join the military in 1977 at age 17. She wanted to join the Navy because a friend had done that, but instead she enlisted in the Marine Corps because that recruiting office was open on the Saturday she decided to sign up.
She said she had to pass a test to earn her high school diploma to be able to join. She served four years, and then went to college, earning a bachelor's degree in sociology from the State University of New York at Binghamton.
D'Andrea also did some graduate work in substance abuse counseling at the University of Southern Maine. She moved to Maine about two decades ago and has lived in Scarborough nearly half of that time.
She owns a business, Gaia Consulting, which works with nonprofits. She also is known for being the host of Sound Ecology, a longtime talk/public affairs radio show on WMPG community radio at the University of Southern Maine in Portland. She took a sabbatical from that show last year. The people she interviewed during the 12 years the show aired included Ralph Nader and rock star Patti Smith, and the issues discussed ranged from women and alcohol to biodiversity to economic justice, D'Andrea said.
She was elected to the Scarborough Town Council in 2008, the top vote getter in a field of six candidates. D'Andrea said she decided to run because "I was looking for a way to connect in a meaningful way with my community."
D'Andrea, who currently does not own a gun, said that the desire to do meaningful work for a cause she believes in is the reason she became director of Citizens Against Handgun Violence in August. The position became vacant when the former director left after two years to take another job, Franklin said.
The group's current key mission is to convince gun owners to "feel more responsible about how they transfer their guns," whether it's by selling them at gun shows or through classified ads, Franklin said.
The group is pushing for tougher laws regarding background checks on gun sales. However, Franklin said that until that happens, he'd like to see gun owners voluntarily seek background checks on the people they're selling their guns to. "Who would want to sell a gun to a criminal?" he said.
D'Andrea said her father taught her to get involved if she wanted to change things.
"We all can do something," she said. "You don't have to be a rock singer, you don't have to be Mother Teresa, you don't have to be anybody but who you are to make a difference."







Contact           Donate 



Copyright 2000-2010 MCAHV & MCAHV-F. All Rights Reserved.